<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Church Site Redesign: Step 1 &#8211; The Kick-Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.faithandweb.com/2007/04/24/church-site-redesign-step-1-the-kick-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.faithandweb.com/2007/04/24/church-site-redesign-step-1-the-kick-off/</link>
	<description>A Church Web Diva's Musings on Excellence in Religious Websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna Belle</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandweb.com/2007/04/24/church-site-redesign-step-1-the-kick-off/comment-page-1/#comment-8207</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandweb.com/?p=24#comment-8207</guid>
		<description>Hi Don --

Great to hear from you!

Alas, we still haven&#039;t really gotten deep into redesign.  We keep hovering on the edges, and then one thing or another happens to slow us down (e.g. illness in the family).  And the truth is our site is adequate, which undercuts some of our motivation.

To answer your question, I&#039;ve used MS Project too, but it seems like a semi when most churches just need a pick-up truck.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basecamphq.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Basecamp&lt;/a&gt; is a great alternative if your church can afford it.  For me, just using spreadsheets works very well, and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if it does for you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Don &#8211;</p>
<p>Great to hear from you!</p>
<p>Alas, we still haven&#8217;t really gotten deep into redesign.  We keep hovering on the edges, and then one thing or another happens to slow us down (e.g. illness in the family).  And the truth is our site is adequate, which undercuts some of our motivation.</p>
<p>To answer your question, I&#8217;ve used MS Project too, but it seems like a semi when most churches just need a pick-up truck.  <a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/" rel="nofollow">Basecamp</a> is a great alternative if your church can afford it.  For me, just using spreadsheets works very well, and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it does for you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandweb.com/2007/04/24/church-site-redesign-step-1-the-kick-off/comment-page-1/#comment-8151</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandweb.com/?p=24#comment-8151</guid>
		<description>Hello again, Anna Belle, and thanks for this very helpful roadmap. We&#039;ve cranked up a group here in Schenectady with plans to redesign our site and have adapted your roadmap to our needs.

It looks to me like your site has benefited from your process -- I like a lot of things about it. I don&#039;t remember, of course, what it looked like before. I&#039;m wondering if you have written any more about your process; this page is called &quot;Step 1 the kickoff&quot;. Perhaps Steps 2 etc. would be helpful to us also.

One specific question: did you use, or do you have suggestions for, a way to organize timeline and task dependencies? I&#039;m not a Project Management expert, although I have used MS Project at work in the dim past. That would definitely be overkill here (no Gantt charts needed). Something more like your Excel spreadsheet roadmap might be just right.

Thanks again,
Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again, Anna Belle, and thanks for this very helpful roadmap. We&#8217;ve cranked up a group here in Schenectady with plans to redesign our site and have adapted your roadmap to our needs.</p>
<p>It looks to me like your site has benefited from your process &#8212; I like a lot of things about it. I don&#8217;t remember, of course, what it looked like before. I&#8217;m wondering if you have written any more about your process; this page is called &#8220;Step 1 the kickoff&#8221;. Perhaps Steps 2 etc. would be helpful to us also.</p>
<p>One specific question: did you use, or do you have suggestions for, a way to organize timeline and task dependencies? I&#8217;m not a Project Management expert, although I have used MS Project at work in the dim past. That would definitely be overkill here (no Gantt charts needed). Something more like your Excel spreadsheet roadmap might be just right.</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.348 seconds -->
