I was about to do an article on Google Analytics, when I realized some of you might not have a Google Account. Perish the thought, but to cover all eventualities, that’s the first step. The thing is, once you do get an account, you’ll have access to a bonanza of other Google tools. While Analytics is enough of a reason in itself for this church web diva, it seemed prudent to cover the big picture first.
There are two steps. First you go to the Accounts page:
In the lower right corner, you click on “Create an account now,” fill in a few straightforward fields, and you’re off. That’s it. I promise.
In priority order, here my favorite Google Account tools.
And if these aren’t enough for you, see Google’s own much longer list of options.
NB: lest you think I’m snubbing Google Webmaster Tools, they aren’t really part of the Account suite, though they seem to be moving in that direction. Also, they’re considerably less intuitive than all of the above, so I’ll save them for a future post.
Update 6/23/07: Be sure to check out Mark Alves excellent post on picking the best Google account for the job.
Weebly, a new startup by three Penn State students, makes it incredibly easy to build a professional-looking website for your congregation – and it’s free. As they put it: “Our focus is to maintain elegance and simplicity coupled with powerful features, to allow all types of users to create, manage, and host their website, free of charge.â€
I tried it out, and set up a site in under an hour. All you have to do is sign up for an account. After that it’s mostly just dragging and dropping “elements†(text and image holders, Google maps, YouTube videos, etc.). You don’t need to know the first thing about HTML, much less how to program. You can even test-drive it.
In the Plus Column
In the Minus Column
The bottom line: if you need a small, simple website or if ease-of-construction is paramount and you’re willing to compromise on a small site, Weebly looks like a winner. I’d recommend trying it out.
I confess. I adore books. However, I’m a librarian, and I ascribe to Nancy’s Pearls of Wisdom (found on the Librarian Action Figure box). “Life is too short and the library is too large to ever read a book that you’re not thoroughly enjoying.â€
Like Ms. Pearl, I’m ruthless, and if after 50 pages it’s not doing it for me, I stop. Thus I only read about 50 pages of most books.* That includes books about the web. I read a lot of them, and put even more to one side.
It occurred to me that you might find it helpful to know which books have my seal-of-approval. So I’ve done a new Bookshelf page for this site, culling out the best-of-the-best for those of you who like books and want to create a great website for your congregation or faith.
Do you have any particular favorites? Books I’ve overlooked? Suggestions? I’m all ears.
*Footnote: If you are over 50, Nancy Pearl’s further Rule of 50 can be invoked. “Subtract your age from 100 – the result is the number of pages you should need before deciding whether or not to continue on.â€
A Christian web developer recently asked me about web apps for prayer requests. He thinks, and I agree, that, “The social networking aspect of web 2.0 applications would be a great platform.â€Â I think Ajax in particular has a lot of potential.
He asked if I knew of resources that might be helpful. I don’t, but thought some of you readers might. If you do, drop me a line.
Got 100 dollars? 7 Experts share budget website marketing tips: Mark Alves just pointed out this great post. It reminds me of last year when our church’s kind-hearted Finance Chair wanted to increase the website budget by just this – $100. My church’s co-webmistress and I said “Why? Our web host isn’t raising its price.†Now it’s time to start kicking myself, and maybe whip out a web begging bowl.
I’ve culled through the article, extracting the tips that strike me as most helpful to congregations. In no particular order, they are:
Now it’s time to stop kicking myself. Almost to a person the experts consulted for this list pointed out that it’s not so much about spending money. It’s all about content, links and working hard.
I just happened across several more blogs at the intersection of faith and web — or close to it. From a quick look it appears they all started at about the same as this blog. Interesting. An idea whose time had come perchance?
From it I discovered:
How PastorHacks.Net uses BackPack particularly intrigues me.
So much web. So little time. But I’m very much looking forward to exploring all three.
If I were in charge of my denomination, I would make supporting and improving congregational websites one of my top priorities – maybe even one of my top three priorities. I don’t say this because I’m a webmaster. It’s just from paying attention – and not having any particular investment in the old models. Websites have become critical to congregations, and all too frequently I hear the concern of congregations who don’t have people like me to help them.
I’d shift money for marketing and communications from some of the more expensive, traditional venues into distributed websites. The goal would be to develop a simple website-building environment for congregations that wanted such a thing. Of course, I wouldn’t just throw money at new technologies. That’s completely unnecessary. Important doesn’t equal expensive. And this should take very, very little money.
I’d just budget for the following:
I don’t have the slightest doubt that congregations are hungry for this. I hear appeals for this kind help repeatedly on Websters, the listserv for church webmasters. And when my denomination’s Information Technology and Electronic Communications Committee (ITEC) did focus groups on what was most wanted, every group – congregational presidents, church administrators, district staff and ministers – asked for website resources.
Nor do I have the slightest doubt that the return on investment would be colossal. It would grow the faith, reaching out in myriad ways that were scarcely possible 10 years ago and unimaginable 20 years ago.
Technically I’m not new to the world of blogging. I started my first in 1999. You can still see the remains of it, blogged painstakingly with good old HTML. Much has changed in the eight intervening years, with a whole culture growing up around blogs. Since then I’ve dabbled a bit and grown to love WordPress in particular, but haven’t been serious again until this blog.
For me, getting serious means reading up on something – buying the best books in particular. (I’m a still a book-buying librarian at heart.) So, I chose two books:
Now I wonder, which should I recommend? The simple answer is it depends, but if in doubt and curious, read both. Clear Blogging is a first-rate introduction with an abundance of helpful insights and practical hands-on advice. It even has a section for ministers (pages 114-118 in particular). Just flipping through its pages right now I want to read it again, which is a great sign.
The Blogging Church covers much of the same territory, with introductions for beginners and tips, but its strength is its focus. While it’s geared to Evangelical pastors, for those of us with somewhat different faiths and careers, it’s not difficult to translate.
My sense is that Evangelicals are at the forefront of using technology. Here in Nashville, the Southern Baptist Convention’s LifeWay has always been in the web vanguard. I remember attending a Macromedia Users Group years ago where their staff demonstrated streaming video. However, blogs have remarkable potential for all faiths, not just the tech-savvy. Here are the kinds of points Bailey makes which are more universal:
Maybe it’s because I’m one of those volunteers, and not staff, but I particularly appreciated this last point. Bailey unpacks what a children’s religious education blog might have, with ideas along the lines of:
Those are by no means all of his suggestions and ideas. For that, I’d encourage you to buy the book or look for it in your public library. Or if you just want to try out blogging, and already know your beat, then check out Clear Blogging.
One of the details of a website is its “favicon” – a teeny-tiny graphic that typically displays near the top of browsers, next to the web address. Every favicon is connected to the particular website you are looking at (not the browser). For example, if you were using Google in Firefox, you’d see Google’s boxy blue G favicon, like this:
![]()
I just made a favicon for Faith and Web. If you look above, close the top of your browser, you’ll probably see a pair of red spectacles next to the URL. If you don’t, chances are you’re using a browser that doesn’t recognize favicons or your browser cache needs to be cleared.* In any event, while favicons are fresh on my mind, I thought I would let you know how to make your own and share a few generic religious ones I’ve made. I’ve put the latter in a zip file with some instructions:
Technically a favicon is 16×16 pixel file in a proprietary Microsoft format. Creating them is different than other graphics, but fortunately there are some web tools to create your own.
Photoshop is my method of choice. To use it, you’ll need to download the Telegraphics plug-in. It works quite easily – just using the Save As command and choosing “ICO†from the dropdown. The hard part is that it’s so small. If you are shrinking a larger graphic, a couple of tips are to start with an even size (something like 64×64 pixels) and use the Resample Image/Bicubic Sharper when reducing the size. If you want a transparent background, just hide the background before saving.
After you have your itty-bitty ico image, put it in the root directory of your site and upload it. For many browsers, that will be enough. But it’s also a good idea to add a line of code like the following in the header code (somewhere between the <head> and </head> tags):
<link rel=”shortcut icon” href=”http://yourwebsitename.com/favicon.ico” type=”image/vnd.microsoft.icon” />
That’s all there is to it.
* Footnote: Safari caches favicons in an unusual way. You can’t just clear the cache. You have to go to User / Library / Safari / Icons and delete the files in that folder.
Yesterday I discovered Code like a girl, and have been dancing on air ever since. I’ve always, since just a baby web diva, fiddled with code until it looked just right, picking up after the likes of Dreamweaver, not to mention Word. Until yesterday, the closest I’d come to affirmation of my seemingly compulsive tendencies to tidy code was an absolutely astonishing book on Internet Art. It’s filled with wonders such as code that shapes and mailing lists to counter the “unbearable lightness of Wired.” But that’s art.
For those like Mr. Web Diva who don’t program, and say, “Huh? What are you talking about?†… this has to do with how one arranges one’s source code – the characters and computer files that drive not just web pages, but computer programs. Some programmers arrange things like if/then statements in tidy rows and columns with consistent indentations. Those are girl (or meterosexual) coders. Other slam code out at a furious pace, unfazed by how it appears. Those aren’t.
One added and not-so-minor point: a user can’t usually see this code (even with a browser’s “View Source†command, although it comes close). That’s because the source code gets compiled in the case of programming and dynamically rendered in the case of scripted web pages.
And what, you say, does this have to do with excellent church websites? Well, aside from the obvious making of a happy webmaster, I like to think a clean source goes hand-in-hand with standards-compliant valid code and accessibility. The latter is especially important for great congregational websites. Churches and church websites aren’t there just for the young with perfect vision and health. They are there for the broken, be it broken in spirit or broken of body.
Of course, it’s possible to have valid code that’s messy and renders a completely inaccessible site, etc., etc., but still…. For those of us who aspire to the highest quality code, tidiness makes life so much easier. Now I’m proud to know I’m a girl coder. And for those who are of a similar persuasion, here are a few great resources.